Just as shown in the example above. However, be aware that this will attempt to update EVERY column in the row, including the primary key. Also, if your table ever gets a virtual column, this will fail. ColumnA , you can not insert a whole line at once. That error can realy hard to find in bigger projects. Maybe this example will give you an idea: Here I use a cursor to fetch the rows from a table. Because I don't loop through them only the first record found is taken and stored in rEmployer.
So rEmpoyer conatins all data from the first rownumber from that table. I use a boolean to check if there is some data found, and if we did we put it on TRUE. After that we update the table. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. Updating a table with record type object Ask Question. I hate them. I like simple things done simply Because every time a developer comes up with something really fancy smancy smart and dandy - we get burned I am a developer, I've burned myself so many times.
Thanks very much! Kashif, June 13, - am UTC. That's been my experience anyway. Getting back to SET ROW, I would be interested to know the actual not hypothetical number of unique update statements generated by Rizwan's application.
Don't think it would be in the millions June 13, - pm UTC. I showed how to do it, i was not advocating it. I've written many many times that "this is not the right way", in books even Rizwan already said it would be lots of unique combinations - hundreds at least I would guess.
Reader03, June 14, - am UTC. Any obvious drawbacks or just a feeling? June 14, - am UTC. I don't like magic. I don't like surprises. One mans Magic Mike, June 14, - am UTC. Get a person to pick a single word, from a single article, from a single page, of one of several daily news papers. That word was the same word as written on a piece of paper that had been in an envelope on stage since the start of the show.
To me that seemed like Magic, to the man on stage it was but application of the tools of the trade. I do not think triggers are univerally bad, nor are sequences, nor are global variables not even the "when others" clause. We are all adults, we should use our tools responsibly, if an instead of trigger on a view is considered the better of the availalbe approaches I see no reason to just say no.
The number of times triggers have burned - countless. They are evil, to be avoided. They are overused, abused, misused.
Your example is a perfect reason why actually. Most of us cannot do magic, but we are asked to maintain it. Alexander the ok, June 14, - am UTC. Even if a "raise" is present, it just hides where the problem is. Just the other day I was helping someone debug vendor code that had when others littered everywhere in huge packages.
Once we commented those out, would found the problem in minutes. Only rows that meet the search condition are updated. If you omit this clause, all rows in the table are updated. This statement updates the row that was just fetched. Example creates a table with correct employee IDs but garbled names. Examples Example creates a table with correct employee IDs but garbled names.
0コメント